Part 1: Adobe Stock Contributor Royalties
Part 2: Adobe Stock Contributor Website & Apps
Up until late 2019, Fotolia continued to exist alongside Adobe Stock while they built out features on the new site.
Now, the Adobe Stock contributor site is fully featured and quite easy to use. They still add new features from time to time, but all the essential ones are already in place.
- FTP upload
- Simple model release attachment
- Automatic keyword suggestions
- Automatic category suggestions
- Real-time (or close to it) sales reporting
Perhaps some of the things lacking at this stage are robust portfolio tools, such as a variety of ways to search within ones own portfolio. Also, while there are ‘Collections’ this seems quite limited and the public display of it isn’t the best. But I fully expect these kind of things to be improved over time.
At this stage they don’t have a dedicated mobile app for contributors. But the website is responsive, so it works well on all devices, allowing you to work on the run.
Watch The Adobe Stock Contributor Video
Part 3: Adobe Stock Contributor Earnings Experience
Let’s go back to where Adobe Stock came from for a moment: Fotolia.
Many were turned off Fotolia prior to 2016 due to their cuts to contributor commissions. At one point Fotolia’s rate was just 20% commission for new independent photographers. This raised to 23% after 100 credit sales (subscription sales equaled only 1/4 of a credit sale). Then the scale continued to climb, but most photographers would likely stay in the measly 23% – 25% royalty range for some years. Terrible to say the least – yet they did sell a lot of images.
Thankfully, this has all changed as mentioned above due to the Adobe purchase. People were nervous when Adobe announced the acquisition, but surprisingly all the changes made were for the better. A website revamp, royalty increases, friendly customer relations. Credit where credit is due – Adobe got this one totally right.
Because of this, contributors really started getting behind Adobe Stock and they haven’t been disappointed.
Sales are very regular and it’s not just subscription sales either. Many contributors are ranking Adobe Stock in their top 3 or so microstock agencies, with some even now finding they are out-earning Shutterstock!
While 33% isn’t the highest royalty in the industry, it does feel sustainable and therefore unlikely to change. Many of the agencies that have started higher at 50% or even 60% have lowered it drastically, disappointing contributors along the way. But it feels like Adobe has settled on a workable arrangement for the long-term.
Adobe Stock Contributor Review Highlights
Part 4: Adobe Stock Contributor Recommendations
As you’ve seen, our Adobe Stock contributor review is a positive one. They are highly recommended. There’s really no reason not to join them as a contributor.
The upload process is easy and the website works.
Image acceptance is high and review times are decent, usually within a few days of submission.
They seem to sell equally well for photos as vectors, and video sales are about on par with other decent agencies like Depositphotos.
These days it’s rare for a new agency to come along that you can recommend so clearly. In hindsight, that’s the great thing Adobe Stock did – they made their ‘new’ agency not so new by purchasing an existing one that they could improve. Great move on Adobe’s part that is paying off for all involved.
If you’re serious about selling stock, then you need to become a contributor at Adobe Stock.
Show Your Support
Like the article? If you found it helpful, please show your support by purchasing a great stock image from just $5.
We rely on on your generosity to continue to provide useful and up to date content for stock contributors.